It is possibly one of the most repeated debates of the modern era, but also one of the most attractive, a topic that we never tire of discussing and listening to. Who has been the best player in history without a Grand Slam title? There are many candidates, all of them defensible, although Greg Rusedski seems to have it very clear. The Brit has given us his opinion, and besides, supported it.
"The talent that Marcelo Ríos had was out of any scale, it was incredible," declares the former World No. 4. "There hasn't been a player who hasn't won a Grand Slam that had his hands, he had everything for the game. Without injuries, I think he would have won not only one, but more than one Grand Slam. I can imagine him winning in Paris, although he lost the final in Australia. In the New York cement, there is no reason why he wouldn't have been successful, so the hardest part would have been at Wimbledon. In the other Grand Slams, undoubtedly, he could have won," Greg assures.
This news is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Rusedski se moja sobre quién fue el mejor jugador sin título de Grand Slam: “Su talento estaba fuera de lugar…”

