Possibly one of the most repeated debates of the modern era, but also one of the most attractive, a topic we never tire of discussing and listening to. Who has been the best player in history without a Grand Slam title? There are many nominations, all defensible, although Greg Rusedski seems to have a very clear idea. The Briton shared his opinion with us, and furthermore, supported.
"The talent Marcelo Ríos had was off any scale, it was incredible," declares the former World No. 4. "There hasn't been a player who hasn't won a Grand Slam and had his hands; he had everything for the game. Without injuries, I believe he would have won not just one, but more than one Grand Slam. I can imagine him winning in Paris, even though he lost the Australian final. There's no reason why he wouldn't have been successful on the cement of New York, so the most challenging would have been Wimbledon. In the other Grand Slams, undoubtedly, he could have won," Greg affirms.
Questa notizia è una traduzione automatica. Puoi leggere la notizia originale Rusedski se moja sobre quién fue el mejor jugador sin título de Grand Slam: “Su talento estaba fuera de lugar…”
[pixels-player]