The thrilling controversy surrounding Jasmine Paolini's presence at the WTA Finals 2025

Streaming WTA Finals live tennis

🎾 Aryna Sabalenka vs Jasmine Paolini

1. Sign up with Bet365 here
2. Make your first deposit of at least €5
3. Go to the “Live” section and watch every match

Watch the match on Bet365

 PUBLICIDAD

Register at bet365, deposit €5 or more into your account and receive 100% of your qualifying deposit in Bet Credits (up to €100). Deposit €50 or more and you will also get 10 Golden Chips to use on selected slots. New customers only. Terms apply. Winnings exclude the Bet Credits stake. Minimum deposit of €50 required for Golden Chips. Maximum prizes, game restrictions, time limits and terms apply. Registration required.

The intricacies within the official rules of the WTA are intricate and difficult to interpret for fans, players, and media. Evidence of this is a soap opera surrounding Jasmine Paolini and her qualification for the WTA Finals 2025, which will cause great unease for a Mirra Andreeva who may feel disadvantaged.

Perhaps many do not know that both the WTA and the ATP set a number of mandatory tournaments to compete in all categories, with the WTA 500 category tournaments being particularly problematic. Currently, all top-ranking players in the world, such as Jasmine Paolini, must compete in at least 6 tournaments of this level.

This explains the controversial miracle of Jasmine Paolini's qualification for the WTA Finals 2025

Failure to do so results in a loss of earnings by not having access to a Bonus Pool distributed at the end of the year. Players also face a penalty in their WTA ranking by receiving a 0 in that event and missing out on points in another tournament they did compete in. The Italian competed in 5 WTA 500 tournaments but did not receive a penalty for not meeting the minimum requirement of 6, as Swiatek and Sabalenka did, for example. Why? This is explained by the Polish journalist Dominik Senkowski.

This is where the strategic vision of players comes into play, and the reason why, on many occasions, they withdraw from a tournament less than 48 hours before it starts, even when they have been present at the event venue and participated in promotional activities and the official press conference. This is what Paolini did at the Adelaide tournament, announcing her withdrawal two days before the start. The controversy arises because the official rules of the WTA indicate that an absence must be justified for medical reasons, but Jasmine argued that she needed rest after her participation in the United Cup 2025.

Mirra Andreeva was unable to compete in Tokyo due to a visa issue

The significance of this detail and the WTA granting the Italian player the privilege of exemption from a sanction are crucial, as Jasmine Paolini has qualified for the WTA Finals 2025 by just 6 points ahead of Mirra Andreeva. If the WTA had marked the Italian with a 0 for her absence in Adelaide, she would now have 10 fewer points in her tally, corresponding to her participation in the Montreal tournament. She would be ninth in the WTA Race, and the one heading to Riyadh would have been the Russian.

To add more drama to the situation, Jasmine Paolini withdrew from the Tokyo tournament as she had guaranteed her place in the WTA Finals 2025. However, why did Mirra Andreeva not maximize her chances of qualifying by competing in that event? It seems that the Russian did not obtain the necessary visa to compete in Japan, preventing her from extending the battle for the eighth spot in Riyadh. In summary, a convoluted and difficult-to-understand situation that offers the Italian the opportunity to compete in the season-ending tournament.

This news is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, La rocambolesca polémica que rodea la presencia de Jasmine Paolini en las WTA Finals 2025