Ferrer makes it clear: Alcaraz did not refuse to go to Chile

It has been widely discussed on social media this past weekend that Carlos Alcaraz attended the Laver for money and that led him to decline going to Chile to represent Spain in the Copa Davis. The reality is that this is not the case. David Ferrer has clarified that this version does not reflect what actually happened. Alcaraz was coming off a significant injury, and there were serious doubts about how he would physically respond, and it was the Spanish captain himself who decided not to put pressure on Carlitos.

Although we at Punto de Break already explained why Alcaraz did not play the Davis Cup but did play the Laver Cup, Ferrer's words in an interview with Relevo detail how the conversation unfolded before the team for Chile had to be announced. The main condition was Alcaraz’s physical state, which was still uncertain regarding how his body would react post-injury, especially considering the demands of a Davis Cup match and the possibility of playing much longer and more demanding matches. Ferrer understood the situation from the very beginning and preferred not to take unnecessary risks.

Alcaraz, the Davis Cup, and Ferrer: the explanation that dismantles the controversy

Ferrer has been particularly clear in explaining how everything was managed. At no time does he speak of a categorical refusal from Alcaraz to represent Spain, but rather a situation marked by the physical uncertainty of the Murcian player. In fact, when the announcement of the team was made, Carlos still did not know if he would compete in the US Open and under what conditions.

“Carlos was coming off a significant injury, and I had to give the list. He didn’t know if he would be able to play, how he would react to five-set matches. I was told from the very beginning that it was going to be very difficult. I also didn’t want to pressure them,” Ferru comments to Relevo.

The Spanish captain also fully understands the position adopted by Alcaraz's team. After a significant injury, subjecting the player immediately to the demands of such a match was uncertain, with a change of surface included. Ferrer, instead of demanding his presence, chose to respect the player’s recovery plan.

“It was a risk for them, and I understood that perfectly. Carlos has always been available for the Finals. Last year, he wasn’t able to participate because he got injured at the last moment; otherwise, he would have been with us,” he acknowledges.

Se ha leído mucho por aquí que Alcaraz rechazó ir a Chile. Eso no es verdad.

El propio David Ferrer lo explica.

🗣️ "Carlos venía de una lesión importante y yo tenía que dar la lista. Él no sabía si iba a estar, cómo iba a reaccionar a partidos de cinco sets. Me dijeron desde un… pic.twitter.com/Vsl32VvBKP

— José Morón (@jmgmoron) September 29, 2026

His words gain even more importance due to all that has been said in recent weeks. The temporal coincidence between the tie against Chile and Alcaraz's later participation in the Laver Cup sparked numerous criticisms. One repeated argument was that the Spaniard preferred to compete in a tournament where players receive significant financial compensation rather than represent Spain.

Ferrer’s explanation leaves any malicious reasoning without substantial grounds. Alcaraz did not refuse to play the Davis Cup in order to play the Laver Cup. When the captain had to formulate his list, the physical state of the Murcian still raised too many doubts. His subsequent evolution allowed him to return to competition, but that does not automatically invalidate a decision made earlier under a different physical scenario.

Ferrer emphasizes Alcaraz's sincerity

“It’s not easy with the calendar they have. I like them to be honest, to tell me things clearly. Whether it’s a yes or a no, you know? And, in that aspect, Carlos has always been honest with me,” concludes the Spanish captain.

The issue of Carlos Alcaraz's commitment to the Davis Cup comes up almost every season when he does not participate in a tie, something that also happens with many of the circuit's great figures due to an increasingly demanding calendar. In this specific case, however, attributing his absence in Chile to a choice between the Davis Cup and the Laver Cup oversimplifies a situation that Ferrer has explained much more clearly.

Alcaraz was coming off an injury, was unsure of how he would physically respond, and his captain decided not to force a decision. Nothing more. That he was later able to return and compete in London belongs to another moment in his recovery.

And Ferrer himself points to what really matters now. Alcaraz has always shown his availability to compete in the Davis Cup Finals. Last season, only a last-minute injury prevented him from being with Spain. In 2026, unless a new physical problem arises, the scenario is the same, and the Murcian is available to be in the final phase that will take place in November.

Therefore, turning his absence in Chile into an economic choice in favor of the Laver Cup does not align with the explanation given by the person who made the sporting decision. Ferrer knew the state of Alcaraz, spoke with his team, and understood that it was not the right time to take risks. The rest has been, fundamentally, noise from people who only want to provoke controversy on social media, regardless of whether it is true or not.

This is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Ferrer lo deja claro: Alcaraz no rechazó ir a Chile