La question de chaque été : Djokovic peut-il à nouveau gagner Wimbledon ?

Streaming ATP Eastbourne tennis en direct

🎾 Jan Choinski vs Yibing Wu

1. Inscrivez-vous sur Bet365 ici
2. Effectuez votre premier dépôt d’au moins 5 €
3. Allez dans la section « Live » et regardez chaque match

Regardez le match sur Bet365

 PUBLICIDAD

Inscrivez-vous sur bet365, déposez 5€ ou plus sur votre compte et vous obtiendrez 100 % de votre dépôt admissible en crédits de pari (jusqu’à 100€). Offre réservée aux nouveaux clients. Conditions applicables. Les gains n’incluent pas le montant des crédits de pari. Des gains maximums, des restrictions de jeu, des limites de temps et des conditions s’appliquent. Inscription obligatoire.

Andy Roddick has returned to focus on the eternal debate of modern tennis: who truly dominates the grass of Wimbledon, and why Novak Djokovic remains, even with the passage of time, a serious threat for the title in 2026. In a recent conversation about the peculiarities of the grass game, Roddick made a clear and nuanced defense of the Serbian's candidacy, relying not on nostalgia, but on the logic of the sport.

The former world number one starts from a key idea: grass does not reward the same type of tennis as clay or hard courts. While at Roland Garros physical exchanges and the use of topspin dominate the pace, at Wimbledon the margin for reaction is drastically reduced. According to Roddick, this difference completely transforms the circuit's hierarchies. “On grass, you can get out of tough situations by hitting the ball better than on any other surface,” he points out in his analysis, emphasizing that the game is decided more on the first impact than on the point's construction.

In this context, Novak Djokovic's figure takes on special relevance. For Roddick, the Serbian embodies like few others what he calls “first-strike tennis”: precision in the return, the ability to hit deep and neutralize the opponent's serve without the need for long exchanges. On grass, where the low bounce reduces reaction time, that skill is magnified. A firm return down the middle, explains Roddick, not only neutralizes the serve but also forces the opponent to play in a more direct and predictable manner, something Djokovic has perfected over the years.

Another element that Roddick emphasizes is the efficiency of movement on grass. Unlike other surfaces, where stops and lateral movements are constant, at Wimbledon many times the best resource is to follow the direction of the shot, advancing half a step or even a full step. Djokovic, with his elasticity and ability to adjust his body in milliseconds, fits perfectly into that pattern. It's not about running more, but about moving better and earlier.

Djokovic's return, key to understanding his candidacy at Wimbledon

Roddick also dismantles the myth that grass favors only big servers. Although the serve remains important, the modern reality of the tournament shows that the best returners have gained prominence. In this sense, Djokovic not only competes but redefines the standard. His ability to return even difficult balls deep eliminates the opponent's time and turns each game into a duel of immediate execution.

The conversation gains even more relevance when the competitive context is introduced. With uncertainty about the form of figures like Jannik Sinner and the ongoing generational transition, Roddick suggests that Djokovic can clearly read the landscape. Even without being at his most dominant physical peak, the Serbian can build a competitive narrative in his favor at Wimbledon.

In short, Andy Roddick's defense is not sentimental but strategic. For him, Djokovic not only remains a candidate in 2026: he is, by the pure logic of grass, one of the tournament's most dangerous names. On a surface where details weigh more than endurance, Novak Djokovic's tennis fits too well to ignore.

Cette actualité est une traduction automatique. Vous pouvez lire la nouvelle originale La pregunta de cada verano: ¿puede Djokovic volver a ganar Wimbledon?