Draper and Auger-Aliassime Star in the Mother of All Controversies in the World of Tennis

The world of tennis does not usually offer situations as bizarre as what was experienced in the round of 16 of the ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati 2024 in the match between Jack Draper and Félix Auger-Aliassime. The chair umpire, Greg Allensworth, who has been in the media spotlight for controversial decisions in recent weeks, such as disqualifying Shapovalov in Washington, made a tremendous mistake, unleashing a media storm. One positive aspect of situations like the one experienced at the ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati 2024 during the clash between Jack Draper and Félix Auger-Aliassime is that they can lead to changes in the regulations and correct aspects that are not covered as they should be. What happened was as follows: Draper was at match point, served wide, the Canadian returned at his opponent's feet with his backhand in response to his net approach, and Draper volleyed in an unorthodox manner. The ball took on a strange effect and crossed the net, without Félix even bothering to look at its trajectory, as he assumed it had bounced on his opponent's side first. - Félix Auger-Aliassime showed great composure in his protest The feeling was common among all spectators. Those who have played tennis at a certain level know perfectly well that when this happens, the ball has a different trajectory than usual and, above all, an implausible forward spin in a logical situation. While it is true that the ball hits the net tape, which dulls the sensation, it is clear how it shoots forward. However, the chair umpire, Greg Allensworth, who has been involved in two controversial situations in recent weeks, with Shapovalov and Fritz as protagonists, did not notice the issue and awarded the point and victory to Draper. From that moment, a calm and very respectful protest from Félix Auger-Aliassime unfolded, as he did not lose his temper despite knowing that a tremendous injustice had been done to him. "Seriously, this is ridiculous. Haven't you seen that the ball bounced on his side?" On the other hand, Draper claimed that he was not clear about what had happened, although Félix pointed out that he knew perfectly well that his ball had bounced on his side because he has been playing for a long time, and it shows. The British player denied it and requested that the replay be shown on the big screen to make a decision. - Draper was willing to replay the point only if confirmed that his ball had been illegal The supervisor's role also sparked controversy as Jack Draper directly told him that if he had seen on TV that the action was illegal, he was willing to replay the point. However, the rules do not consider the possibility of reviewing such an action, so the supervisor did not comment. Félix Auger-Aliassime asked the chair umpire once again if he was 100% sure of his decision, and when he told him that he would not change it, he decided to drop the matter. As a conclusion, it should be noted that actions like this should be included in the cases subject to review by technology because the means are available to do so. It seems clear that Greg Allensworth will face some form of retribution from the ATP due to the serious and grave error made, which is exacerbated by the two controversial situations in previous weeks. Impeccable attitude from Félix Auger-Aliassime, who set an example for everyone with his behavior, while the one raising more suspicion is Jack Draper, who could have shown sportsmanship by offering to replay the point if he had doubts, as it is logical to assume.

This news is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Draper y Auger-Aliassime protagonizan la madre de todas las polémicas en el mundo del tenis